Financial Claims of Lenders and Shareholders
Learning Outcome Statement:
compare the financial claims and motivations of lenders and shareholders
Summary:
This LOS explores the differences between debt and equity financing, focusing on the nature of financial claims, risk-return profiles, and the potential conflicts of interest between lenders (debtholders) and shareholders. It discusses how these financing options affect corporate financial structure and stakeholder dynamics, including the implications of financial leverage and the impact on firm valuation.
Key Concepts:
Debt vs. Equity Claims
Debt holders have fixed and priority claims on the firm's assets and cash flows, requiring regular interest payments and principal repayment on maturity without decision-making power in corporate governance. Equity holders have residual claims, meaning they are entitled to what remains after all obligations are met, and they possess voting rights influencing corporate governance.
Risk and Return Profiles
Debt is generally less risky for investors as it offers fixed returns and has priority over equity in bankruptcy situations. Equity, while riskier, offers potentially unlimited upside returns as shareholders benefit directly from any increase in the firm's value.
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts arise due to the differing objectives of debt and equity holders. Shareholders might prefer high-risk, high-return projects and increased financial leverage to maximize returns, potentially at the expense of financial stability. In contrast, debtholders prefer lower risk to ensure the timely repayment of their investments.
Formulas:
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE measures the profitability of equity investments, indicating how effectively a company uses investments to generate earnings growth.
Variables:
- :
- Return on Equity
- :
- Net profit after all expenses, including interest
- :
- Total shareholder's equity